9 MINUTES AGO 🔴 World number 1 cyclist Tadej Pogačar has sparked controversy after announcing he will not be taking part in cycling’s “Pride Night”, saying: “The sport should only focus on performance on the track, not on political issues or social movements.”
Tadej Pogačar, the Slovenian cycling superstar and current world number one, has once again captured global attention—but this time for a reason far removed from his record-breaking performances on the road. In a statement released earlier today, Pogačar confirmed that he will not participate in the highly publicized “Pride Night” event organized by the international cycling community. “The sport should only focus on performance on the track, not on political issues or social movements,” he said, sparking a wave of debate and criticism across social media platforms, sports networks, and cycling fan communities worldwide.
Pogačar, 26, is renowned for his dominance in multi-stage races and his remarkable versatility, yet his decision to opt out of an event celebrating diversity and inclusion has drawn immediate backlash. Critics argue that as one of the most visible figures in the sport, he has a responsibility to support initiatives that promote equality and representation within cycling. Many have taken to Twitter and Instagram to express disappointment, stating that athletes like Pogačar hold a unique position of influence and that refusing to engage sends the wrong message to fans, especially younger generations who look up to him as a role model.
Supporters of the Slovenian champion, however, have defended his position. They argue that Pogačar is focused on his professional responsibilities, namely preparing for upcoming races such as the Giro d’Italia and the Tour de France. According to them, participation in
non-competitive events could distract from the rigorous training schedules required at the elite level. Some fans have also emphasized that while supporting social movements is important, athletes should have the freedom to choose which events they engage with without being subjected to public criticism or pressure from sponsors.
The controversy also highlights a broader tension in modern sports: the growing intersection between athletic performance and social activism. Over the past decade, athletes across disciplines—from soccer and basketball to track and field—have increasingly used their
platforms to advocate for social justice causes. Initiatives such as Pride Nights, Black Lives Matter campaigns, and climate awareness events have become common, with governing bodies often encouraging participation to demonstrate solidarity and inclusiveness. However, the debate surrounding Pogačar illustrates that not all athletes share the same perspective on blending sports with social advocacy.
Cycling authorities have yet to issue an official response, though several organizers of Pride Night events have expressed disappointment. They stressed that the initiative is meant to celebrate diversity, foster inclusivity, and promote a welcoming environment for all fans, riders, and members of the cycling community. Despite Pogačar’s absence, the event is expected to go forward as planned, featuring prominent riders and teams who have expressed enthusiastic support.
For Tadej Pogačar, the decision to prioritize competition over participation in social events may further polarize his fan base, but it also reaffirms his singular focus on performance. Whether this choice will have lasting implications for his reputation or sponsorship deals remains uncertain. One thing, however, is clear: Pogačar has ignited a conversation that goes far beyond cycling results, touching on the role of athletes in societal and cultural movements—a debate that will likely continue throughout the season.
