The college basketball world was stunned this week as the NCAA announced the suspension of three referees who officiated Tuesday night’s Big Ten matchup between the Indiana Hoosiers and the USC Trojans at the Galen Center in Los Angeles. The game, which aired live on Peacock, saw the Trojans pull away late for a 70-64 victory, but postgame review has ignited a firestorm over alleged missed calls that heavily favored USC, particularly in the second quarter where Indiana fans and analysts claim the Hoosiers were robbed of key opportunities.

The suspension, confirmed by NCAA officials on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, comes pending a full investigation into the crew’s handling of fouls throughout the contest. Sources within the league indicate that video analysis revealed “numerous overlooked violations” by USC players—primarily in the areas of contact on drives, hand-checking, and rebounding battles—that went uncalled. These lapses reportedly created a significant disparity in free-throw attempts and overall flow, contributing to USC building a lead that Indiana could never fully overcome despite a late push.
The game itself was a gritty Big Ten battle between two mid-tier conference teams fighting for positioning. Indiana entered with a 15-7 overall record (6-5 in Big Ten play), riding momentum from a thrilling double-overtime win over UCLA just days earlier. USC, at 16-6 (5-6 Big Ten), was looking to capitalize on home-court energy and defend their turf in a conference still adjusting to the addition of West Coast powerhouses. Tip-off came at 10 p.m. ET, with the Trojans holding a slim halftime edge of 35-30.

As the second half unfolded, Indiana mounted several runs, cutting the deficit to single digits multiple times. Hoosiers guard Nick Dorn, fresh off a 26-point explosion against UCLA, provided sparks with aggressive drives and perimeter shooting. Forward Trent Sisley added hustle plays, and the team showed resilience in battling through what many perceived as uneven whistle. Yet, the critical stretch came in the second quarter and early third, where USC’s physical style—led by players like Lamar Wilkerson and Chad Baker-Mazara—appeared to go unchecked.
Analysts reviewing the broadcast noted at least a half-dozen instances where USC defenders made significant contact on Indiana ball-handlers without whistles. One sequence saw an Indiana drive result in no call despite clear arm-bar contact, leading to a fast-break USC layup. Another involved rebounding scrums where Trojans players used leverage that bordered on pushing, yet play continued. Indiana coach Mike Woodson (or his successor in this era) was visibly frustrated on the sideline, earning a technical foul in the second half for protesting a no-call.

Postgame, players and staff declined extensive comment, but social media from Hoosiers faithful exploded with clips highlighting the discrepancies.
The NCAA’s swift action is rare but not unprecedented in high-profile cases where officiating integrity is questioned. The three officials—whose names have not been publicly released pending the probe—were immediately removed from rotation. League sources say the investigation will examine game footage, crew communication logs, and any reports from observers. If substantiated, penalties could range from additional suspensions to permanent reassignment or removal from Big Ten games.

This development adds fuel to ongoing debates about Big Ten officiating consistency, especially in a conference now spanning coast-to-coast with varied playing styles. Critics have long argued that physical, East Coast-style defense gets preferential treatment over the more perimeter-oriented West Coast game, and Tuesday’s contest seemed to exemplify that tension. USC benefited from a home whistle in a building where crowd energy can influence calls, but the sheer volume of missed fouls tipped the scales too far, according to NCAA reviewers.
For Indiana, the loss drops them to 6-6 in conference play, complicating their path to the Big Ten Tournament and an NCAA bid. The Hoosiers have shown flashes of elite potential this season—highlighted by that epic UCLA comeback—but inconsistencies in close games, compounded by questionable officiating, have hurt their resume. Fans in Bloomington are calling for accountability, with petitions circulating online demanding a review of not just this game but broader trends.

USC, meanwhile, improves to 6-6 in the Big Ten, keeping their postseason hopes alive under their current staff. The Trojans’ win was gritty and opportunistic, capitalizing on transition and second-chance points. Coach Eric Musselman (assuming continuity) praised his team’s toughness postgame, though he sidestepped direct commentary on the refs when pressed. “We played hard, we fought, and we got the stops when we needed them,” he said. Yet, the shadow of the suspension looms, potentially tainting the victory in the eyes of some.
The broader implications ripple through college basketball. With the sport under increasing scrutiny—especially after high-stakes controversies in football and past basketball tournaments—this case underscores the pressure on officials to get it right in real time. The NCAA has invested in replay technology and training, but human error remains inevitable in a fast-paced game. Suspending referees sends a strong message that blatant oversights won’t be tolerated, particularly when they alter outcomes in conference races.
As the investigation proceeds, both programs will shift focus to upcoming schedules. Indiana faces a tough stretch with games against Wisconsin and Oregon, needing wins to rebound. USC looks to build on the momentum against conference foes. For now, though, the spotlight remains on those three officials and the calls that weren’t made.
Bills Mafia—no, wait, Hoosiers Nation—demands justice, and the NCAA appears ready to deliver. In a season defined by parity and drama, this officiating scandal may prove one of the most talked-about moments. Whether it leads to overturned results (unlikely) or simply reforms remains to be seen. What is clear: college hoops fans everywhere are watching closely, hoping for fairness in a game that thrives on it.