Shocking Revelation: The referee of the fight between Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford admitted his partiality, deliberately harming the 35 -year -old boxer to avoid his victory. The boxing community was stunned when the AMB published a video by referee Thomas Taylor revealing the reasons for his controversial actions.

Impacting Revelation: The referee admits the bias in Canelo Álvarez vs. Terence Crawford Fight, deliberately sabotaging Canelo’s victory

In an unprecedented scandal that has shaken the world of boxing to its nucleus, referee Thomas Taylor, who officiated the fight for the high -risk medium -sized weight title between Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford on September 13, 2025, has admitted that the deliberately disadvantage of Angel, 35 years old, to avoid his victory. Bombshell’s revelation came to light on September 18, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. PDT (8:00 am ICT, September 19), when the World Boxing Association (AMB) launched a condemnatory videos of Taylor confessing to the partial offense. The admission, together with the confirmation of the AMB of the controversial result of the fight, has left the Boxing Community stunned, reviving the calls to the reform and threatening to fly the historic victory of the unanimous decision of Crawford.

The fight that defined a generation

Álvarez-Crawford’s clash in Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas, which was attended by 70,482 fans and transmitted more than 41 million viewers in Netflix, was announced as the fight of the century. Crawford, uploading two kinds of weight, surpassed Álvarez with speed and precision, ensuring a unanimous decision victory (116-112, 115-113, 115-113) to claim the medium-sized weight titles Super Middle Middle of the WBA, WBC, WBO, IBF and RING. The victory made Crawford the first male boxer to hold indisputable titles in three kinds of weight at the time of four tapes. However, dirty game accusations, including a failed drug test and a corruption of the referee, have thrown a dark shadow on the result.

The referee’s confession

In a pump video released by the AMB, obtained through an anonymous complainant and verified byESPN, referee Thomas Taylor admitted to having intentionally biased his arbitration to favor Crawford. Recorded in a private conversation on September 15, 2025, Taylor is heard: “I made sure that Canelo could not get comfortable. He is 35 years old, beyond his best moment: Crawford was the future. I leaned his way.” Taylor confessed that Crawford’s supposed infractions, including a low blow in the sixth round and excessive possession in Clinches, while emitting warnings to Álvarez who interrupted his rhythm.

The video, which exploded in X with more than 25 million visits in a matter of hours, also shows Taylor claiming that external pressure influenced its decisions. “There were people who wanted a new king,” he said, without naming details. The confession aligns with previous accusations of Manny Pacquiao, who alleged that Crawford’s team brushed Judge Max Deluca, although Taylor’s admission changes the approach to his own actions. The hashtag #canelorobbed laid worldwide, with fans publishing: “Taylor admitted that he cheated Canelo! This is a #Justiceforcanelo #Justicephorcane.”

Controversial decisions that inclined the balance

Taylor’s actions during the fight caused scrutiny even before his confession:

Round six under blow: Taylor emitted a warning to Álvarez for a low blow, but ignored a previous and unnecessary coup of Crawford, which allowed him to maintain the impulse.
BUTBUTT PAUSE IN THE NINE ROUNDError 500 (Server Error)!!1500.That’s an error.There was an error. Please try again later.That’s all we know.
Clinch management: Frequent Taylor interventions in Clinches seemed to favor Crawford, breaking exchanges when Álvarez landed heavy body shots.

These decisions, combined with Judge Max Deluca score card, which gave Crawford eight rounds, fed bias suspicions. Compubox statistics show that Álvarez got 99 blows at the 115 of Crawford, with heavier blows, asking questions about the score. “Canelo was stolen,” former champion Andre Ward tweeted. “Taylor’s confession shows it.”

The indignation of the boxing world

The launch of the AB video has caused generalized indignation. Canelo Álvarez, speaking at a press conference in Guadalajara on September 18, demanded that the fight be declared not answering. “I knew something was wrong in that ring,” he said. “Taylor stole my chance. I want my titles to return.” The promoter Eddie Hearn requested the prohibition of Taylor’s life and a boxing review, stating: “This is the worst scandal from the 1988 Olympic Games.”

The Crawford camp, which is already fighting a separated prohibited substance scandal, denied participation in Taylor’s actions. “Bud won the fair,” said coach Brian McIntyre. “Taylor’s confession does not change the fact that he overcame Canelo.” Crawford tweeted: “I don’t control the referees. Simply fight. This is a #budthegoot configuration.” However, the Nevada Athletic Commission, already investigating Taylor and Judge Deluca for alleged bribery, expanded his investigation to include the admission of referee’s prejudices, with a hearing scheduled for September 22, 2025.

Fans in X are divided, with #tayLorbias and #Canelodeservesjustice accumulating 15 million commitments. “Canelo fought against the referee too! Unpleasant corruption #boxingscandal,” a user published. Others defended Crawford: “Bud dominated. Taylor’s bias did not change the #Teamcrawford result.” The controversy has generated parallel to the historical boxing scandals, such as the Holyfield-Tyson rematch of 1997, with analysts warning about a crisis in the credibility of sport.

The AB response and the possible consequences

The AMB, together with the WBC, WBO and IBF, issued a joint statement that recognizes the video and promised cooperation with the Nevada Athletic Commission. “If bias is confirmed, we will take decisive measures, including unemployment titles,” said the AMB. A failure without concept could strip Crawford of his titles, restore Álvarez or activate a belt tournament. The commission is also investigating whether Taylor’s actions were influenced by external parties, with the Saudi financial Turki al-Sheikh, who financed the fight, facing scrutiny despite the fact that there was no direct evidence.

Analysts predict that a failure without concert could lead to a 2026 rematch, potentially exceeding $ 500 million from the original. “This scandal is bigger than the fight,” he saidIllustrated sportsColumnist Chris Mannix. “A rematch would be a global phenomenon.” However, the accusations of doping against Crawford, which involve a derivative of synthetic testosterone, could complicate things, with a separate audience established to determine if it faces a prohibition.

A sport under victory

Thomas Taylor’s bias admission in Canelo Álvarez vs. Terence Crawford Fight has plunged boxing into one of its darkest moments. With the AB video that exposes deliberate sabotage, fans and combatants demand justice, while Crawford’s legacy hangs in balance in the middle of dual scandals. The September 22 hearing of the Nevada Athletic Commission will be a decisive moment, potentially rewriting the result of a historical fight and remodeling the future of boxing. While the world debates the reasons for Taylor and Crawford’s victory, one thing is clear: the integrity of sport is in court. Follow the drama that develops in X and is attentive to updates.