Juan Manuel Márquez surprises boxing fans when choosing Manny Pacquiao about Floyd Mayweather in the greatness debate! 😱🥊

In one of the most unexpected statements in the history of boxing, Juan Manuel Márquez has chosen Manny Pacquiao about Floyd Mayweather as the best boxer of all time. This bold statement has sent shock waves through the boxing community, leaving fans and analysts in disbelief. Márquez’s comments have revived the old debate about who really deserves the title of “The best of boxing”, and his surprising choice has certainly raised some eyebrows. “Pacquiao first! Mayweather second!” Márquez declared emphatically, sending controversy waves worldwide.

Márquez, one of the most respected figures in sport, is no stranger to heated debates. As a fighter who has shared the ring with both legends, his opinion has a significant weight. His latest comments have added fuel to a conversation that has remained in the world of boxing for years. But what was behind Márquez’s decision? Why did Pacquiao choose Mayweather, since Mayweather has a perfect record and an incomparable career?

El Debate Pacquiao vs. Mayweather

The debate about who has the title of the best boxer between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather has been ongoing for years. Both are considered by many as one of the best combatants in the history of boxing, with their fighting styles and contrasting achievements that feed the rivalry.

Floyd Mayweather, with his defensive genius and his undefeated record, has been acclaimed as one of the best. His technical skill, his ring IQ and his ability to win against the fighters more elite have consolidated their legacy as a great of all time. Mayweather’s perfect 50-0 record is a testimony of his consistency and dominance in the course of his illustrious career.

On the other hand, the explosive power of Manny Pacquiao, the relentless aggression and the will to fight against anyone, anywhere, made him a favorite of fans and one of the most exciting boxers who have ever entered the ring. Pacquiao’s achievements are equally impressive, with world titles in eight different kinds of weight, which makes it the only fighter in the history that does. His exciting battles against some of the best in sport have won the admiration of boxing enthusiasts worldwide.

Despite Mayweather’s undefeated record and numerous Pacquiao titles, the debate has always been more than just numbers. It is its impact on sport, its fighting styles and its ability to overcome challenges.

Márquez’s shocking statement

Márquez comment, “Pacquiao first! Mayweather second!” He has surprised many in the boxing community. As someone who fought against both men in the ring, Márquez’s opinion has a substantial value. He fought with Manny Pacquiao four times, with his rivalry as one of the most intense and memorable in modern boxing. While Pacquiao won the first two fighting, Márquez finally triumphed at his fourth meeting in 2012 with a surprising knockout, finishing his fierce rivalry with a high note for him.

Against Mayweather, Márquez faced one of the most skilled defensive combatants of all time in 2009. Although he showed resilience and ability, he finally lost a unanimous decision of Mayweather in a fight that highlighted the American tactical brilliance. Despite this loss, Márquez has constantly praised Mayweather’s abilities, recognizing his technical domain.

However, when it comes to the debate about greatness, Márquez’s recent comments suggest that he believes that the style, legacy and impact of sport on Outshine Mayweather sport, at least in terms of his personal criteria for greatness.

“I have shared the ring with both, and the heart of Pacquiao, his willingness to fight anyone and all, and the way he inspired people, that is what makes him the best for me,” said Márquez. “Mayweather is a great fighter, but Pacquiao is the one who gave boxing emotion and emotion. That is what makes it number one.”

Why did Márquez choose Pacquiao?

Márquez’s decision to crown Pacquiao as the best fighter of all time is probably reduced to the Philippine’s unparalleled struggle spirit and his boxing contributions. While Mayweather was often praised for his defensive technique and brilliance, Pacquiao’s explosive struggle style and the will to participate in wars inside the ring made him a loved figure for many boxing fans.

Pacquiao not only won titles in multiple kinds of weight; He did it in exciting and action full fights that left fans to the edge of their seats. Their ability to adapt their style to different opponents, their relentless work ethics and their commitment to assume the best in the world, win or lose, deeply result with boxing purists who value the heart and passion in sport.

Márquez’s decision also reflects a certain level of personal experience. The wars with which he fought against Pacquiao, the emotion, the passion and the ups and downs they experienced together throughout their legendary rivalry, probably influenced their perception. Pacquiao was not just another boxer, he was someone who brought something special to sport, something that fans could feel.

“Pacquiao always gave everything. He is a warrior, and that is what made him highlight,” added Márquez. “Floyd Mayweather was a teacher of his trade, but Pacquiao made boxing exciting for fans. That’s why it’s first for me.”

The reaction of fans and analysts

Márquez’s comments have caused a storm of reactions worldwide. Fans of both combatants have intervened, defending their favorite boxer and explaining why they believe Pacquiao or Mayweather deserve the title of “better.” While some have praised Márquez for his honesty and boldness, others have questioned whether his opinion is partial due to their history with both fighters.

Boxing analysts have also intervened in the debate, and many agree that the heart, hardness and legacy of Pacquiao cannot be denied. “Pacquiao brought something special to the sport that Mayweather simply could not match in terms of emotion,” said an analyst. “But Mayweather’s undefeated record and defensive skills are unmatched in boxing history.”

Comments have revived the ongoing debate, with boxing fans passionately defending both sides. Some believe that Mayweather’s technical brightness and the undefeated record make him the best, while others argue that Pacquiao’s emotional impact and the exciting struggle style give him the advantage.

The legacy of Pacquiao and Mayweather

Whether you agree with Márquez’s choice or not, both Pacquiao and Mayweather will go down in history as two of the best boxers of all time. Each one defined their era in different ways, and their legacies will be remembered in the coming years. The heart of Pacquiao, his willingness to face anyone, and its impact on sport makes it an icon, while Mayweather’s defensive genius, the undefeated record and technical skill ensure that it is always a legend.

As for the bold statement of Márquez, it serves as a reminder that the greatness in boxing is not determined only by the records, but by the way in which a fighter connects with the fans and leaves an indelible mark in the sport. In the eyes of Márquez, the Pacquiao struggle spirit and the legacy placed it at the top of the mountain.

Conclusion: A debate that will never end

The debate about who is the best boxer of all time will continue in the coming years. While Juan Manuel Márquez’s decision to Coronar Manny Pacquiao about Floyd Mayweather may have surprised some, he has revived a conversation about what he really defines greatness in boxing. Is the undefeated record, the technical ability or the heart and the impact that a fighter on sport and its fans have? For Márquez, it seems that the undeniable passion and legacy of Pacquiao as an artist and fighter put him above all the others.