🚨 NFL Shocker: Roger Goodell Orders Emergency Doping Review After Sean Payton’s Explosive Accusations Against Patriots’ Stefon Diggs in AFC Championship Fallout
In a stunning twist that has sent shockwaves through the NFL world, Commissioner Roger Goodell has directed league officials to launch an immediate review of the AFC Championship Game result between the New England Patriots and Denver Broncos. The unprecedented move comes on the heels of Broncos head coach Sean Payton presenting what he claims is compelling evidence that several Patriots players, including star wide receiver Stefon Diggs, used performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) prior to the January 25, 2026, contest at Empower Field at Mile High.

The Patriots emerged victorious in a defensive slog, edging out the Broncos 10-7 in snowy conditions that limited offensive fireworks. Rookie quarterback Drake Maye‘s scrambling touchdown and a late interception by cornerback Christian Gonzalez sealed the win, propelling New England to Super Bowl LX. But the celebration was short-lived as Payton, visibly furious in the postgame tunnel, accused Diggs and others of doping, demanding an urgent investigation.
Payton’s Bold Claims Ignite League-Wide Scrutiny

Moments after the final whistle, Payton—known for his fiery personality and history of bold statements—didn’t hold back. He reportedly handed league representatives documentation and video clips he believed showed unusual physical performance patterns from Patriots players, particularly Diggs, who had a solid if not spectacular outing in the adverse weather. Payton allegedly pointed to Diggs’ speed bursts and recovery as “unnatural” in the brutal cold, tying it to broader suspicions about the team’s preparation.
“Integrity of the game is everything,” Payton is said to have told officials, echoing his past emphasis on accountability. The Broncos coach, who once served a full-season suspension in the Saints’ Bountygate scandal, framed his accusations as a defense of fair play rather than sour grapes over the heartbreaking defeat.

Goodell, the NFL’s long-time commissioner with a track record of swift action in integrity matters—from Deflategate to personal conduct policies—responded decisively. Sources close to the league confirm that within hours of Payton’s submission, Goodell instructed the NFL’s management and competition committee to expedite a full doping review. This included mandatory, surprise PED testing for key Patriots players involved in the game, with Diggs named prominently due to Payton’s direct allegations.
Players Submit to Testing Amid Fan Frenzy
The tests were conducted overnight and into the early morning of January 26, 2026, under strict NFL protocols supervised by independent labs. Players reportedly complied without public resistance, though the Patriots organization issued a brief statement emphasizing cooperation while maintaining confidence in their program’s cleanliness.
Fans across social media platforms exploded with reactions. Patriots supporters decried the move as a desperate ploy by a losing coach, while Broncos faithful rallied behind Payton, calling for transparency. Hashtags like #DopingGate2026 and #CleanPatriots trended worldwide, with millions tuning in for any breaking updates.
When results were announced shortly afterward, the football world held its breath. All tested players, including Stefon Diggs, returned negative for banned substances. The league’s statement read: “Following a thorough and expedited review prompted by postgame concerns, all samples from the New England Patriots players in question tested negative for performance-enhancing drugs. The results affirm the integrity of the AFC Championship outcome, and no further action is warranted at this time.”
Diggs at the Center of the Storm—Again
For Diggs, the doping cloud adds another layer to an already turbulent 2025-2026 season. The veteran receiver, acquired by the Patriots to bolster their passing attack, has been a key contributor alongside Maye. Yet off-field issues have loomed large: earlier accusations of felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault from a December 2025 incident with a former personal chef led to charges that Diggs has vehemently denied. His arraignment was postponed until after the Super Bowl to accommodate team commitments, a decision that drew criticism but allowed him to play through the playoffs.
Now cleared of doping allegations, Diggs can refocus on the biggest stage. “This is about football, not distractions,” a source close to the player said. Diggs himself has remained silent on the matter publicly, letting his on-field performance—and now the clean test—speak volumes.

Critics question whether Goodell’s rapid response sets a dangerous precedent. Allowing a losing coach to trigger such scrutiny could open the door to postgame challenges becoming routine. Supporters, however, praise the commissioner for prioritizing fairness, especially in a high-profile matchup that decides Super Bowl berths.
The timing is particularly sensitive: with the Patriots advancing to face the NFC champion in Super Bowl LX on February 8 at Levi’s Stadium, any shadow over the victory could tarnish the narrative of their remarkable resurgence under first-year head coach Mike Vrabel.
For Denver, the loss stings deeper now. Payton’s aggressive fourth-down calls in the snow, including a failed attempt that kept momentum from building, already faced second-guessing. The doping accusations may have been a final attempt to salvage pride, but the negative tests leave the Broncos season ending on a note of controversy rather than closure.
What This Means for the Super Bowl Run
As New England prepares for the championship matchup—likely against the Los Angeles Rams or Seattle Seahawks—the focus shifts back to football. Maye’s poise under pressure, the defense’s dominance in brutal conditions, and Diggs’ route-running remain the storylines.
Yet the episode underscores the intense scrutiny modern NFL stars face. In an era of instant replay, social media scrutiny, and zero-tolerance policies, even whispers of impropriety demand investigation. Goodell’s handling reinforces the league’s commitment to a level playing field, even if it means putting champions under the microscope.
Fans are left stunned but ultimately relieved: the game stood as played. The Patriots’ 10-7 triumph remains official, Diggs and teammates are cleared, and the road to the Lombardi Trophy continues untainted by PEDs.
In the end, this controversial chapter may fade into playoff lore—a heated rivalry moment where passion boiled over, evidence was examined, and justice prevailed swiftly. For believers in the game, it’s a reminder that while emotions run high, the NFL’s processes endure.