The world of athletics was rocked in August 2025 when Ukrainian track and field star **Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk** received a four-year ban from the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) for testing positive for testosterone metabolites.
The prominent long and triple jumper, known for her silver medals at the World Championships and her glamorous presence both on and off the track, has vehemently denied intentional doping, claiming the elevated levels stemmed from a medical condition.
This Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk doping scandal has reignited debates about clean sport, anti-doping measures, and the personal toll on athletes accused of violations.

Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk, born in 1995, rose to prominence as one of Ukraine’s top field athletes. She claimed silver in the long jump at the 2019 World Championships in Doha and followed it with another silver in the triple jump at the 2023 Worlds in Budapest.
She also secured European triple jump gold in 2022 and competed at multiple Olympics, finishing fifth in the long jump at Tokyo 2020 and 11th in the triple jump at Paris 2024.
Beyond athletics, Bekh-Romanchuk has built a successful career as a model and influencer, often sharing her life with nearly half a million Instagram followers. Married to Ukrainian swimmer Mykhailo Romanchuk, a multiple Olympic medalist, the couple represents a power duo in Ukrainian sports.
The doping case began with an out-of-competition test on December 7, 2024, which revealed metabolites of testosterone, a prohibited anabolic steroid. The AIU provisionally suspended her in May 2025, just before her planned return at the Diamond League in Doha.
Bekh-Romanchuk and her team argued that the substance resulted from treatment for an unspecified medical condition, supported by a doctor’s explanation submitted in July 2025. However, the AIU ruled that she failed to prove this claim sufficiently, leading to the full four-year ban announced on August 19, 2025.
The suspension is backdated to May 13, 2025, meaning she cannot compete until May 2029, effectively ending her prime competitive years at age 34 upon potential return.
Bekh-Romanchuk has maintained her innocence throughout. In social media posts, she expressed exhaustion from fighting on two fronts: defending her reputation against the AIU and managing personal life challenges.
“I refused to sign any documents that required me to admit guilt because I am an honest person and my humanity and dignity are important to me,” she stated. She hinted at the emotional and health impacts, suggesting the ordeal might force difficult life decisions.
Earlier reports mentioned a possible contaminated supplement as a defense, though the final ruling focused on the unproven medical claim. She retains the right to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), but as of late 2025, no appeal outcome has been reported.
The Ukrainian Athletics Federation issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to clean sport while noting the case’s resolution through established procedures.
Unlike some national federations embroiled in systemic doping issues, Ukraine has not faced widespread accusations, making this high-profile case particularly damaging for the country’s athletics image amid ongoing global scrutiny.
Doping in athletics remains a persistent issue, with testosterone cases drawing extra attention due to debates over natural levels, gender regulations, and performance enhancement. The AIU, established to independently handle such matters, has imposed similar bans on athletes worldwide, emphasizing zero tolerance for prohibited substances.
Critics argue that strict liability rules can punish unintentional violations harshly, while proponents say they are essential to deter cheating and protect clean competitors.

Legendary marathoner Eliud Kipchoge, a vocal advocate for clean sport, has previously condemned doping within Kenyan athletics, calling it an “embarrassment” and a moral failing. The Kenyan distance running community has faced numerous bans over the years, prompting Kipchoge to speak out on the need for integrity.
While he has not directly commented on Bekh-Romanchuk’s case, his stance underscores the broader frustration among elite clean athletes who view doping as undermining the sport’s credibility.
The fallout from the Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk doping ban extends beyond the track. As a glamorous figure in athletics, often highlighted for her modeling work, her suspension has sparked discussions on social media about fairness, mental health, and the pressures on female athletes regarding hormone levels.
Some supporters rally behind her denial, citing potential flaws in testing or contamination risks common in supplements. Others insist on upholding the ban to maintain level playing fields.

This scandal arrives at a time when world athletics continues recovering from past crises, including state-sponsored programs and high-profile individual cases. The AIU’s rigorous enforcement aims to restore trust, but each new ban reminds stakeholders of the ongoing battle against performance-enhancing drugs.
For Bekh-Romanchuk, the four-year absence means missing the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics and multiple World Championships, potentially shifting her focus to modeling, influencing, or family life.
As the sport moves forward, cases like the Maryna Bekh-Romanchuk doping controversy serve as stark reminders of the fine line between medical necessity and prohibited use. Whether through appeal or time, her story highlights the human cost of anti-doping efforts in preserving the purity of athletics.
Fans and fellow athletes alike watch closely, hoping for resolutions that balance justice with compassion in an era of heightened scrutiny.