Max Kellerman’s Bold Claim: Why Manny Pacquiao and Terence Crawford Are the Only True 4-Division Champions

In a recent statement that has set the boxing world ablaze, Max Kellerman declared that only Manny Pacquiao and Terence Crawford should be recognized as the true 4-division champions in boxing history. The comment immediately sparked a heated debate among fans, particularly those loyal to Floyd Mayweather Jr. (TBE), who vehemently disagreed with Kellerman’s assertion. However, the reasoning behind Kellerman’s claim has caused many in the boxing community to pause and reconsider the true significance of being a champion across multiple weight classes.

Max Kellerman, a well-known boxing commentator and analyst, made waves with his bold statement during a live broadcast. He argued that while many boxers have claimed to be 4-division champions, it is only Pacquiao and Crawford who have truly earned that distinction based on the level of competition they faced. Kellerman’s point raised eyebrows and generated significant controversy, especially among Mayweather supporters, but it also opened a critical conversation about what it means to be a legitimate multi-division champion in the sport of boxing.

The core of Kellerman’s argument lies in the quality of opponents that Pacquiao and Crawford faced in their respective weight divisions. Both fighters have not only won titles across multiple weight classes but have also done so against some of the toughest and most accomplished fighters of their time. Manny Pacquiao, in particular, has moved through multiple weight divisions, taking on legendary opponents in each. His victories over fighters like Oscar De La Hoya, Miguel Cotto, and Shane Mosley, among others, cement his legacy as a multi-division champion who conquered the best of his era.

Terence Crawford, on the other hand, has made a name for himself as one of the most skilled and versatile fighters in modern boxing. His ability to dominate in multiple weight classes, particularly his move up to welterweight, and his decisive victories over opponents like Viktor Postol and Jeff Horn, solidified his claim to being one of the greatest multi-division champions of all time. Kellerman’s statement about these two fighters challenges the conventional narrative in boxing, pushing for a deeper examination of what it truly takes to be recognized as the best.

Kellerman’s assertion, however, didn’t sit well with fans of Floyd Mayweather Jr., who has long been touted as the greatest boxer of his generation, if not all time. Mayweather, often referred to as “The Best Ever” or TBE, has claimed world titles in five different weight classes, but his ability to dominate the sport in terms of undefeated records and skill is what has earned him his legendary status. Many of Mayweather’s fans were quick to criticize Kellerman’s remarks, pointing out that Mayweather’s accomplishments should not be undermined, particularly when it comes to his legacy in the welterweight and junior middleweight divisions.

The backlash from Mayweather’s fans is understandable, given the boxer’s unparalleled career and legacy. However, Kellerman’s point about the quality of opposition in the 4-division championship debate raises an important issue. While Mayweather’s defensive brilliance and record-breaking achievements are well-known, his career lacked the same level of risk-taking against top-tier opponents across varying weight divisions, especially when compared to Pacquiao and Crawford. This isn’t to say that Mayweather isn’t a legend, but Kellerman’s argument challenges the notion of who should truly be regarded as a “complete” champion in boxing.

What makes Kellerman’s claim particularly striking is that it emphasizes the importance of taking on challenges across a wide range of opponents, rather than simply collecting titles. In many ways, boxing history has been dominated by fighters who sought out the toughest challenges, often moving up in weight classes to face formidable opponents. Pacquiao, for example, moved from flyweight to welterweight, and even light middleweight, conquering different styles and opponents along the way. His willingness to step into the ring with dangerous competitors from multiple weight classes sets him apart as a truly versatile and fearless champion.

Similarly, Terence Crawford’s ascent to the top of the welterweight division has been marked by an almost flawless track record of dominant victories. His technical skill, adaptability, and intelligence in the ring have allowed him to easily move up in weight and still maintain a level of excellence rarely seen in boxing. While some may argue that Crawford’s career is still in progress, his achievements in multiple divisions have already established him as one of the most skilled and accomplished fighters of his generation.

In the face of Kellerman’s controversial claim, the boxing community has been forced to reexamine what it means to be a multi-division champion. It’s not just about collecting titles across different weight classes, but about the level of competition faced and the ability to adapt to new challenges. In this regard, both Pacquiao and Crawford stand out not only for their victories but for their willingness to face the toughest opponents, regardless of weight or status.

At the heart of Kellerman’s argument is a fundamental truth: being a multi-division champion is not just about moving up in weight to collect belts, it’s about proving yourself against the best and overcoming challenges that others may shy away from. Pacquiao and Crawford’s ability to do so is why they stand out as the true 4-division champions in boxing history. Their legacies will continue to influence future generations of fighters, and their careers will be remembered as exemplars of excellence and bravery in the sport.

In conclusion, while Max Kellerman’s remarks have sparked significant debate, they serve as a reminder that boxing is not just about titles but the quality of opposition faced in the pursuit of greatness. Manny Pacquiao and Terence Crawford have earned their places in boxing history by proving their mettle in multiple weight classes, taking on the best fighters in each division, and showcasing their incredible versatility. While Mayweather’s achievements are undeniably impressive, Kellerman’s assertion challenges the traditional narrative and invites boxing fans to reconsider what it truly means to be the greatest.