The headline you provided is a classic example of highly charged, tabloid-style commentary that mixes real events with strong editorial spin. Here’s a clear, factual breakdown of the underlying claims, based on publicly documented moments.

### The “Mocking” of Queen Elizabeth IIThe core accusation refers to a scene in the 2022 Netflix docuseries *Harry & Meghan*. In it, Meghan Markle recounts her first meeting with Queen Elizabeth II and demonstrates how she performed a curtsy. She describes the moment as surreal for an American unfamiliar with royal protocol and reenacts it with an exaggerated, theatrical deep bow and outstretched arms, saying something along the lines of: “It was like that… like I curtsied as though I was like… Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty.”

Many viewers and royal commentators interpreted the reenactment as mocking or disrespectful to the late Queen and to centuries-old British royal tradition. Royal editor Roya Nikkhah called it “slightly disrespectful.” Body language experts and critics noted that Prince Harry appeared uncomfortable or attempted to cut the moment short. The clip went viral, with some accusing Meghan of turning a serious protocol into comedy.

Others defended it as light-hearted storytelling or an honest depiction of culture shock for someone entering the royal family from a different background. Meghan had previously mentioned practicing the curtsy with help from Sarah, Duchess of York. In the same documentary and in the 2021 Oprah interview, she also spoke positively about the Queen personally, describing her as “wonderful” and noting kind gestures.

There is no widely reported instance of Meghan “brutally mocking” Queen Elizabeth on global TV in a direct, hostile way outside this reenactment. The Netflix scene remains the primary flashpoint critics return to years later.

### The “Most Trolled Person in the World” ClaimIn April 2026, during a visit to Australia with Prince Harry, Meghan spoke to young people at a mental health organization. She said: “For now, 10 years, every day for 10 years, I have been bullied and attacked. And I was the most trolled person in the entire world… Now, I’m still here.”

This statement reignited debate. Supporters see it as highlighting the intense online abuse and media scrutiny she has faced since her relationship with Harry became public. Critics call it hyperbolic, pointing out that many public figures — politicians, other celebrities, and even Donald Trump — have faced massive online vitriol. Some analyses of early trolling against Meghan noted coordinated negative campaigns, but quantifying “the most trolled” is inherently subjective and difficult to verify objectively.

The timing of the claim, while the couple was on a high-profile tour involving wellness discussions and public appearances, led some to accuse her of positioning herself as a perpetual victim while maintaining a wealthy, influential lifestyle.

### The Hypocrisy AngleThe suggested hypocrisy rests on two ideas:1. Complaining about being heavily trolled and bullied online while allegedly participating in behavior (the curtsy reenactment) that many saw as disrespectful and that itself generated significant backlash and further trolling.2. Speaking about mental health harms from social media while critics argue the Sussexes have used media platforms (Netflix, interviews, books) to share personal stories that invited public debate and division.

These are matters of interpretation. The curtsy scene occurred in 2022; the “most trolled” remarks came in 2026. People can evolve, reflect, or feel the cumulative weight of criticism over time. However, the contrast fuels ongoing polarized commentary: one side sees a woman sharing genuine vulnerability after years of scrutiny, the other sees inconsistency or selective victimhood.

Prince Harry’s reaction in the Netflix clip is often described as awkward or disapproving rather than “smirking,” according to body language observations. He has generally been more protective of royal family members in private settings while publicly supporting his wife.

### Broader ContextPublic discourse around Meghan Markle remains deeply divided. Supporters view much of the criticism as rooted in racism, classism, or misogyny, especially given her status as a biracial woman entering a historically white institution. Critics argue her actions — from the Netflix series to repeated public disclosures — show a pattern of undermining the monarchy while continuing to benefit from royal titles and connections.

Queen Elizabeth II herself responded to the 2021 Oprah interview with a measured statement noting that “some recollections may vary” while affirming the couple remained loved family members. The late Queen’s approach was one of private resolution rather than public escalation.

In summary, the headline dramatically frames a 2022 documentary moment and a 2026 public statement as proof of “shameless hypocrisy.” The events are real, but the interpretation — “brutally mocked,” “turned royal protocol into a laughing stock,” Harry “smirking” — is subjective and amplified for emotional impact. Reasonable people can disagree on whether the curtsy reenactment was harmless storytelling or poor taste, and whether claiming to have been the “most trolled” person is a fair personal reflection or an overstatement.

Public figures at this level face intense scrutiny from all sides. Claims of victimhood and accusations of disrespect both tend to fuel endless cycles of online debate rather than resolution. The facts of the Netflix scene and the recent Australia comments are straightforward; the moral judgment depends heavily on one’s preexisting view of the Sussexes.